Financial Aid and college affordability is a specialty area for me as I feel very strongly about it. Most families with college bound children are concerned about the rising cost of college tuition, their ability to afford college, and the financial security of their family and child. Independent Educational Consultants with expertise in the area of financial aid are uniquely positioned to assist families in not only identifying colleges that are good matches academically and socially, but financially as well. Sandy Baum, an economist who has studied financial aid in depth, has written extensively about net price differentials in her seminal study “A Primer on Economics for Financial Aid Professionals”. Regardless of how one views the ongoing debate about whether sticker price should be based on ability to pay (need), on merit, or on willingness to pay – college consultants should be able to explain the economic underpinnings of college pricing systems to their clients. What should also be addressed is the economic practice of price discrimination. Higher education is not unique in selling the same product to different consumers at different prices.
In today’s economy, it is difficult for individuals lacking a college degree to find a well-paying job. Even the remaining manufacturing jobs that have not been outsourced overseas require at least some post-secondary education. Having a college degree is what having a high school diploma used to be – an essential entry-level credential for many fields. Yes, many families overspend on education and overdose on student loans. The majority, however, graduate with a reasonable amount of debt ($26,000) – contrary to sensationalistic media reports that depict student borrowing at the margins.
In my practice I spend a great deal of time educating my clients about college pricing and provide strategies with the goal of making the process more affordable. Also, I encourage students and families to borrow as little money as possible – although, if unavoidable, maximum college loans of $20,000/30,000 is not an unreasonable amount in my opinion. I attempt to optimize the student’s chances of receiving merit based aid by identifying schools where the student will be in the top quarter of the applicant pool. Also, I assure families that many schools employ their own algorithms when awarding aid that have more to do with Enrollment Management than assessing need. In many cases the federal methodology is a starting point only. When borrowing, I encourage families that won’t qualify for federal need-based aid to still complete the FAFSA as this is required for the government funded loans which have much better terms and rates than private loans. Finally, I try to match students to schools with the likelihood that the student will experience success in college and graduate on time – potentially saving families the costs of changing majors, transferring or dropping out.
Is a liberal arts major still worthwhile? There has been much discussion in the media and popular press of late regarding this question with experts on both sides of the divide positing convincing views. Add to this mix the countless and often apocryphal stories about student debt – with the standard “lead in” recounting the tale of the unemployed anthropology major – and you’ve got the makings of an emotionally charged debate. Interestingly, Richard Arum and Josipa Roska, authors of the recent book “Academically Adrift” which followed 2300 students at 24 universities over the course of four years found that students who took traditional liberal arts and science courses fared better in terms of the increase in skills measured by the Collegiate Learning Assessment than students who took undergraduate courses in preprofessional fields. Additionally, and not surprisingly, the authors found that courses requiring large amounts of reading and writing – which is the “sine qua non” of the liberal arts – tended to learn more. Conversely – and perhaps more anecdotal in nature compared with the hard data presented by the other side – are numerous articles describing employers unable to find the skilled workers that they need to run their businesses. Companies today do not have the time nor the resources to train new employees. As Tony Wagner of Harvard, the author of “Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People Who Will Change the World” explains, “the world no longer cares about what you know; the world only cares about what you can do with what you know”. Here’s the disconnect – the merger of the information technology revolution and globalization has wiped out many decent-wage, middle skilled jobs and replaced them with decent-wage, high-skilled jobs. But enough Americans aren’t ready – likely one reason unemployment rates still hover close to eight percent.
As an Independent Educational Consultant I grapple with this dilemma daily. How do I counsel students and families to choose majors wisely, particularly clients who are borrowing heavily to attend college. Presently, I employ a centrist strategy working within the confines and limitations dictated by both the liberal arts and preprofessional tracks. I encourage my liberal arts students to think about how their majors relate to “real world” jobs. Also, I press this group to find summer internships in the business sector and seek out research positions with their college professors. For those students following the professional route I urge them to look at institutions which require a liberal arts general curriculum before entering the professional major – there’s no reason that professional programs and the liberal arts need to be mutually exclusive. Finally, I place a heavy emphasis on rigorous high school classes. There’s no substitute for this – “prologue truly is epilogue” – and those with the best academic foundation and preparation will have the most choices in the end.
While it has long been a key source of opportunity, a higher education is a necessity in today’s world. And while high school students are thrilled when that “fat envelope” signaling a college acceptance arrives in the mail, parents are often shocked at the cost! Recent data shows that tuition and fees have increased 439 percent from 1982 to 2007, and given the current state of the economy along with shrinking state budgets allocated to education this appears to be a trend that will continue.
The good news is that there is a great deal of financial aid available to students and families who qualify – more than $130 billion in aid is awarded each year. Gift aid – money that does not need to be paid back – is available in two forms. 1) Merit aid which is awarded to students based on specific talents in academics, athletics, or the arts. 2) Need-based aid which is based on the student and/or family’s income. There is also self-help aid – either Federal Work Study or Student Loans. Federal Work Study provides federally subsidized part-time jobs to students. The Federal Student Loan program offers both Subsidized (the U.S. Department of Education pays the interest that accrues on these loans while the student is still in school) and Unsubsidized Loans. The government loan program is excellent – usually with much lower interest rates than regular loans, income –based repayment plans, and under certain circumstances loan deferment and forbearance that allows postponement of loan repayment.
Don’t get sidetracked by the myths surrounding financial aid: that you can’t get it if you own your home, or if you have savings in the bank, or if you make more than a certain amount of money, or even if you are not a U.S. citizen. Also, don’t rule out a school based on “sticker price”. Tuition discounting is pervasive – the national average is said to be as high as 40%. Not everyone pays the same price for a given college. Strong students need to think strategically – being at the top of the applicant pool at certain schools can translate to thousands of dollars in merit aid.
A final note – college is a business like any other. It provides a service and then must find customers who are willing to pay for this service. Of course we all know that college is a life changing experience that is way more than a business – but try to keep sight of the bottom line. Become an educated consumer by seeking out college consultants with thorough knowledge and understanding of the financial aid process.
Many of you will be visiting college campuses this summer. The summer prior to senior year is an ideal time for this, however, many students and families choose to do this even earlier in high school or during spring break. A visit usually includes an hour-long group information session led by an admissions officer and a group tour led by a student guide.
Don’t limit your visit to the formal tour and information session. Make sure to spend time on your own exploring the campus – the student union and library are great places to get a feel for the overall atmosphere and tone of the school. Read the student newspaper, check out bulletin boards, and most importantly observe students – you can learn a great deal just by watching student interactions. If you are planning on visiting several colleges in one trip, make sure to allow enough time for each visit. An overnight stay in the college city is ideal.
Here are a few suggestions for questions to ask admissions officers:
Remember to write down your observations and take pictures. Particularly when touring several colleges on one trip, facts and details can become blurred and forgotten if not recorded. Finally, don’t base your perception of the college solely on your visit. Oftentimes, even without realizing it, students and families are influenced by the personality of the admissions officer, student tour guide, and even the weather the day of the visit! The college visit is one important way to assess a college, but not the only way.
Before you can blink an eye, the less demanding middle school years morph into high school and beyond. College planning is probably not the first issue that student-athletes and their parents want to tackle as the middle school years wane and high school begins. However, making a commitment to establishing long-range academic goals – along with developing strategies and timelines to support this effort – will pay high dividends down the road.
The “junior/senior year” crunch (and believe me, it can be overwhelming for both students and parents alike) is much easier and efficient with a game plan that begins in late middle school or early high school. I can’t tell you how many times I have met with families and heard them lament, “I only wish I had thought about this earlier!”
Listed below are just a couple of academic guidelines that are right at the top of my”It’s never too early” list:
1) Foreign Language – Colleges love to see students take at least three years of a foreign language. Four years are even better, and five – with the fifth year being at the AP level – is stellar. However, in order to fit that fifth year of a foreign language into four years of high school, the student needs to begin a foreign language in the 7th grade. Usually what happens is that 7th/8th grade foreign language study combines to form Level 1.
Check to see if your middle school offers a foreign language beginning in Grade 7 (not all schools do), and plan on enrolling.
2) Upper Level Math – Not only do most four-year colleges and universities expect to see at least three years of math in high school, they love to see four years of study. And, as with foreign languages, having taken an AP-level math class as a junior/senior in high school is highly-valued in applicants at the most selective schools.
In order to be eligible to enroll in the more challenging, upper level math classes in high school, you most likely will have to start with pre-algebra in the 7th grade and complete it in one year. Many middle schools have a two-year sequence in order to complete Algebra, and while this curriculum does not always preclude the opportunity to take AP math in high school, it can make it more difficult to do so.
It is worthwhile to take a look at your middle school curriculum early and undestand its pathways for math education. Armed with this information, you will be able to more accurately plan math courses for high school.
“Prologue really is Epilogue” when it comes to successful college placement outcomes. So, keep these thoughts in mind as you move through middle school and look toward high school. Stay informed and updated.
And remember, it’s easy to become overly stressed by this process. I always remind my clients to relax, “enjoy the journey”, and have fun!
Check back for upcoming articles where I will address additional topics pertaining to academic preparation for college student-athletes. I’ll discuss subjects such as SAT/ACT preparation and testing, the college essay, teacher recommendations, and much more.
As I continue my work with student-athletes and their parents who are beginning the athletic recruitment process, I find that the greatest obstacle they face is obtaining accurate, informed, and honest information about the various components of collegiate athletics. Even families who are exceedingly organized and methodical when it comes to successfully navigating junior tennis have misconceptions and incorrect information.
I thought it would be helpful – and interesting – to discuss a few of the most common myths relating to college athletic admissions and recruiting. Here are two that I frequently encounter in my role as a private college athletic consultant: 1) matriculation eligibility rules, and 2) home schooling as it relates to recruiting.
Myth 1: Matriculation Eligibity Rules
This is probably the issue where I find the most misinformation and the greatest inaccuracies. While the vast majority of junior tennis players will never go on to play professional tennis, many hope to “buy a few years” and try pro tennis for a while – deferring the decision about attending college.
These players, armed with rankings and results that are capable of attracting the attention of college coaches, have spent years training and dedicating themselves to tennis. They want to take advantage of NCAA rules that allow them to retain their amateur status while playing professional events and not accepting prize money.
This approach sounds like a logical plan, one that provides a win-win in terms of life choices. However, the NCAA rule regarding delayed matriculation to college is quite restrictive.
The NCAA rule states that the student-athlete is expected to complete high school according to the “prescribed educational path in his or her country”. The student-athlete then has one additional year in which he or she must enroll to retain four seasons of eligibility.
In other words, in this country, once you start high school, you are expected to finish in four years and enroll in college within a year after that – period. A student who does not enroll at a collegiate institution after that one year period will lose a season of intercollegiate tennis eligibility. And, after that one-year period, if the student-athlete has engaged in organized tennis (e.g., tournament tennis), the student-athlete must attend school for a year before being eligible to compete.
So there are definite scenarios where kids can defer college, but make sure you understand the price of enrolling after the deadline.
Myth 2: Home Schooling
Home schooling has firmly positioned itself as a legitimate educational option. There are an estimated 1.5 million home schooled students in the U.S. Given the travel time required to obtain a high USTA national or ITF ranking, it is no surprise that many junior tennis players and their families make the decision to follow this route.
Travel translates to school days missed. Independent study, flexible scheduling, and online classes – the hallmarks of home schooling – can make tennis travel more manageable.
However, when it comes time for college recruiting, I frequently see home-schooled junior tennis players who are both surprised and disappointed to discover that their academic records are insufficient or incomplete.
Home-schooled student-athletes typically don’t have access to the traditional sources of college guidance available at public and private schools, and that lack of guidance can lead to future eligibility issues. This unpleasant scenario can and should be avoided by exercising careful advance planning, obtaining accurate information about academic requirements and NCAA rules, and consulting with a college counseling professional or a college athletic consultant.
Start with the NCAA Eligibility Center – the NCAA department that certifies student-athletes who want to participate in Division I and II athletics. The Eligibility Center has specific guidelines for home-schooled students. Anyone interested in home schooling or other nontraditional high school programs (e.g., online, correspondence, private tutoring, etc.) should familiarize themselves with this information very early on in the process.
And, if you’re aiming for the top academic schools like the Ivies, keep in mind that the minimum NCAA academic requirements will not be sufficient. Premier institutions will expect your academic credentials to be very close to those of the regular applicants. Home-schooled applicants without a conventional high school transcript may find that their standardized test scores (SAT I, SAT II, and AP exams) take on more meaning than they might be for other applicants.
Home schooling and other forms of independent study are attractive options for junior tennis players. But if you’re interested in playing college tennis, make sure to plan ahead and understand the academic guidelines!
The college tennis recruiting process is time consuming, nuanced, and complex, but it is well worth the effort. There’s nothing like being able to continue playing the sport you love in college – and possibly receiving a tennis scholarship, too!
Stay informed. And, if you have questions about the process and need help along the way interpreting the rules and regulations, seek the advice of a qualified college counselor or consultant – preferably one that specializes in athletic recruiting.